Business Research Methods
Course of content:-
v Unit 1:- introductions
to Research
v Unit2 :-
literature Review and theoretical framework
v Unit 3 :-
problem definition and Hypothesis Formulations
v Unit 4
:-Research Design
v Unit 5:-
Measurement, Scaling and Sampling
v Unit6 :-
Data collections and Analysis
v Unit 7:-
Writing proposal and Project Reports
v unit 1:- introductions to Research
concept of Research:
research
refers to the act of searching new knowledge through a repetitive and
systematic process. Research is conducted for two purpose, one is to enhance
the existing knowledge or to develop the new theory in the concerned field and
second for identifying the problem and searching the solutions of such
problems. Thus, research refers to the process of of systematic enquiry or
investigation into a specific problems or issue that leads to new or improved
knowledge for solving the problems. An educational activity that finds the problems
and solutions of the problems this is terms as research . a set of methods that
are used in identifying problems collecting information’s analyzing data and
drawing conclusion this called as
research methodology.
According to F.N kerlinger:-“research is systematic
controlled empirical and critical investigations and hypothesis propositions
about the presumed relation among the natural phenomena.”
Natures and features of
research
some common features of research are given below:-
1.
objectives:- a good research should be objective and it
must be answer the research questions specially not in subjective way. This
requires the formulation of proper hypothesis, otherwise there may, be lack of
congruence between the research questions and hypothesis.
2.
Generalization:- generally, research is
undertaken consideration to the sample. The finding found from the research should be applicable in the large population even though it is drawn from
sample.
3.
Free from personal biases:- a good research must be free
from the researcher’s personal biases and must be based on objectivity and not
subjectivity. It means that methodology should be used so that researcher can
not use his/her perceptions and change the data for manipulating the result.
4.
Reproducible :- a good researcher should
be able o get approximately the same result by using an identical methodology
if investigation is conducted on a population having characteristics similar to
the earlier study.
5.
Directed toward solution of
aproblem:-
research identifies the problem and investigate on every aspect of the
problems. It tries to find out the probable solution of suh problem through
depth study. The research is always directed to solutions of the problems.
6.
Logical :-researcher collect the
information from various sources and interprets the information. Research does
not only present the result on the basis of interpretation but proves those
result using various logic.
7.
Replicable:- conducting a research
using same, methodology is replicability. Conducting research in the same
subject repetitively helps to increase the reliability of research result.
Previous theories should be tested again to improve in those theories after a
pace of time and such repeatedly tested result can be easily generalized in the
large numbers of organizations.
Scientific Research
Systematic investigation on the basis of specified
method and logic is known as logic. There are some scientific methods and
procedures to undertake the research. Thus a systematic controlled empirical and
critical investigation of hypothetical propositions about the presumed
relations among natural phenomena is
known as scientific research. Generally scientific research is conducted for
solving the problems. It analysis all the dimensions of the problem
systematically, and finds out the causes of problem collects and interpret the
data and find out the solutions of the problems. Thus scientific research is
not undertaken based on intuition, experience and estimation but it remains
always purposive and comprehensive.
Features of scientific
research:-
Scientific research is a systematic and empirical research that is
conducted based on evidence and logics. In this regards, the key features of
scientific research are explained belows:-
·
Rigorous: use of good theoretical base
and a sound methodological design is considered as rigorous study in research.
Rigorous study refers to the carefulness and degree of exactness in research
investigation supposes, if any one is doing research considering to few sample
then such research is not rigorous research so that the result may not be
conclusive there may be biasness in asking questions and many other
influences.
·
Purposive:- a research should start
with definite aim. If research is conducted without any aim, such research is
useless. Purpose of research determine the process of sample selection, data
collection and its interpretation. Thus if researcher is able to set the clear
and operational objectives then he/ she can avoid the error and come to the real
conclusion.
·
Replicability:- if the same result is
found while conducting the research again then the result is obtain is
considered as replicable. Scientific research requires such quality. If
observation are not repeatable, then our finding or result are considered
unreliable.
·
Objective:- the scientific research
should enable us to classify facts accurately
and carefully without any bais. The result of our data should be based
on the facts resulting from the actual data and not on our own subjective or
emotional values. Non-data based conclusion mislead to the organization and
support in the reduction of performance.
·
Testability:- researcher develops
hypothesis logically in scientific research. Hypothesis is the estimation of
relationship between the variables. Such relationship is established logically.
Relationships are tested using various statistical and mathematical tools in
scientific research.
·
Precision:- precision reflects the
degree of exactness of the results. The conclusion drawn from the scientific
research must be nearer to the actual result.
·
Operational definitions:- the variable should be
defined in such as way that they can be measured. This eliminates confusion in
meaning and communication like, anxiety causes mistakes in the work” then there
might be confusion about anxiety.
·
Generalizability: - it refers to the scope of
applicability of the research finding in other organizations too. The wider the
range of applicability of the solutions generated by research the more useful
the research to the user.
The scientific research process
Scientific research process
refers to the works or steps which are to be followed while conducting research
process. There are few process of scientific research. In this chapter we will
study discuss the mostly widely used process of scientific process.
v Realizing problems:- first of all researcher should feel the problem for
undertaking research. Problems are created due to change in environment or any
other reasons. Researcher should realize and worried with such problems.
Realizations can be made through feeling, study, experience and observation.
v Identifications of problems:- after realizing the problems researcher should try
to find out causes of problems and actual problem. Researcher should find out
the problems and causes through the collections information and analysis of
situation. Research should define such problems that helps to minimize time and
cost. Hus, researcher should clearly identify the problems.
v Review of literatures:- literature review refers to the study of previous
research documents. Researchers should find out the study gap from the
review literature. It helps to define
the problems and find out the methods which are suitable to study over the
research problems and issue. It also guide to the researcher in methods of
conducting research .
v Hypothesis formulations:- hypothesis formulations refers to the estimated
result of the result of the research. It is estimated on the basis of past
studies. It present the relationship of two variables inn the testable form.
Researcher finds out the problems relatd factors problems through literature
review. On the basis of fact and found from literature review research
formulates hypothesis. It helps to
determine methods to be used and data collected.
v Research design:- research design is a framework
of research. Research works are completed based on research design. It helps to
collect evidence in less time and cost. Research design depends on the objectives of research. It clarifies the
way of collecting data, method of analysis and bases of research. Research
design is prepared before initiating research. Researchers should find out
appropriate research design based on the research problem.
v Collection of data:- collection of information on the basis of research
problem and objectives is referred as data collection. It is the work performed
in the field/ outside the organization. Success of research depends largely on
data collection. Reliable data collection helps to draw reliable conclusion. A
researcher should develop questionnaire, schedule for interview or observation
for collecting data. But data collection differs on the basis of objectives,
research design and need. Researcher should decide what sort of data and
information are essential, before data collection.
v Data analysis:- A researcher classifies all the collected data and information on the
basis of their feature and nature. Classified data are then codified, tabulated
and presented in charts . such presented data are analyzed using mathematical,
statistical, financial and accounting tools. Most of the researchers use
statistical tools for the analysis of data. Mean, median, mode and standard
deviation are descriptive statistical tools and t-test, z-tests and
v Interpretation and generalization:-
After
the analysis of the data, certain conclusions can be drawn in relation to
hypothesis. Whatever the conclusion are drawn, they are considered as theories.
Such conclusions are applied in all the similar organizations which are
regarded as generalization. Conclusions without hypothesis are discussed on the
basis of previous theories. Such discussions create new issues are require
further research.
Paradigms of Research
Paradigms are the patterns
of beliefs and practices that regulate inquiry within a discipline by providing
frames and process through within investigation is accomplished. Major two
paradigms of research are given below:
v positivism:- it is the research philosophy
that is adopted from natural sciences. According to positivism knowledge
develops by investigation the social reality through observing the facts.
v Interpretive:- unlike positivists interpretivists
hold the view that the social world cannot be understood by applying
research principles adopted from the natural sciences and propose that social
science requires a different research philosophy.
Applying the scientific
thinking in management problems
Scientific thinking refers to the goal focused problems solving and
step-by-step logical, organized and rigorous method that helps to identify the
problems gather data analyze the data and draw the conclusions. Research does
not based on hunches experience and intuitions alone but it is purposive and
rigorous. Some major problems in the use of scientific methods in social
science research are given below:
v Complexity of subject matters:- behaviors of the person differs with the pace of time and change in
situation. Need, interest, value and norms of people differ each other. Social
science has unlimited uncontrolled factors. Thus impact of one factor is to be
searched in many other very difficult factors. Likewise why people will not be
motivated? Various explanations you can give to this questions.
v Difficult to obtain accurate measurement:- scientific method requires
specific measurement. It is difficult to measure exactly the social phenomena.
In some case it is essentials to predict the situation based on the behavior of
people. Feeling, perceptions, attitude, etc. of the people cannot exactly
measured and such factors change with change in time and situations.
v Misconceived impression of society:-society have different perceptions then actual one in
some issue of social science. Due to the difference in feeling, people do not
like to give opinion even if they are ready to give opinion or they do not
provide right information. Generally they have misconception about it so they
provide opinion on the basis of some preoccupied concept.
v Subjectivity of social events: generally social events are subjective not
objective. Impact of social events relates to other subject too. Thus
scientific methods cannot be used in social science research. Social events
cannot be measured exactly but conclusion can be drawn from analysis of subjective
facts.
v Emotional tendencies:- social events affect the people so their opinion
differs. Generally, the opinon provided at the general situations and after any
event differs. Thus behavior and methods of doing works of a person depend on
the emotional tendencies.
v Qualitative of social events:- human behavior can not be explained in quantity.
Social events and human behaviors can be explained qualitatively. Social
subject or issue are always interrelated and such relationship can be explained
subjectively but they can not be measured and explained in quantitative.
v Lack of universality of social events:- similar social events are
not perceived in the similar manner. People understand the events differently
as per the context and difference in places. Thus, social research does not get
persuasiveness and acceptance all over the world.
Business
research:
Business research is conducted to generate accurate information for the
use of in decision making. It helps to decision maker to take decision based on
accurate objective information. Research information are neither intuitive or
nor randomly gathered. It refers to the patient study and scientific
investigations where researcher takes antohter more careful look at data to
discover new facts.
Types of business research
On the basis of functions business research is classified as
experiment, survey, and observational study. On the basis of nature of problems
it is classified as follows:
v Exploratory research:- it is conducted to clarify ambiguous problems. When
manager realizes the symptoms of the problems in the organization he /she
undertakes the research for better understanding of the dimension of the
problems that is termed as exploratory research. This study provides
information to use in analyzing situation. Generally this research is conducted
to get conclusive evidence. For example; if a company wants to provide
residential facility to employees for improving their productivity then a
survey is conducted with employees who come from far away and knows their
opinion regarding residential facility. It will help to the managers to take
decision either to provide such facilities to the employees or not.
v Descriptive research:- Descriptive research is conducted to describe the
characteristics of population or phenomena. Descriptive research seeks the
answer of who, what, when, where and how questions. This research usually helps
to segment the market of the business organizations. For example; business
research is conducted to determine the characteristics of consumer who purchase
chicken meat products in Nepal so as to segment the market of chicken meat. It
shall provide accurate information which helps to solve the business problems
but if the survey information is wrong then that will mislead to the managers
and finally hampers to the business performance.
v Causal research :- A research is that is
conducted to see the relationship among variables is considered as causal
research. It is conducted to explain expectation of relationship like;
prediction of sales due to change in packaging, advertising, innovation etc.
researcher requires certain types of evidence to understand and predict
relationship. When business organizations want to change in their Strategies
and policies they undertake causal research. This type of research. This type
of research helps to the business managers to take decisions either to invest
in any activity or not. Thatswhy this research is considered more important in
business.
Role of business research
Business research is
basically related to solving the business problems providing concrete
information for decision making. Thus, business research plays, the following
roles:
v Informational roles:- business research collect the information from
internal record and outside stakeholders and provides deep insight regarding
issue or problems of business to the concern of people.
v Evaluate of methods:-business research
evaluate methods that have been applied by organizations and suggested
the better method that helps to the business community to be more efficient in
their concerned sector.
v Roles of knowledge developer for practical purpose:- business research analyses
the information related to various business problems in macro and micro levels
that helps to obtain practical knowledge and solve the problems of business.
Business situation is ever changing. So, it creates new knowledge that fits to the
new situation.
v Role of planner and decision making:- business research provides hard facts that
serve s base for planning, decision making project implementation and
evaluation.
v Roles of intelligence:- business research accumulates the information from
public proceeding press release and web-sites of government agencies and
competitive organizations and provides such information to its client
organization that helps to gain competitive advantages.
Value for decision Making
Research provides the supports in the following dimensions of decision
making.
v Identify problems:= business research helps to determine the nature of
situations or identify the existence of problems in the organizations. Business
research is used as a scanning activity to provides information about what is
occurring within an organizations or in the environment. It scans th environment and helps to identify potential
problems that may take place in the organization and helps to understand such
situations like change in socio-economics situation and impact of it in the
organization.
v Diagnosing and assessing problems and opportunities:- after identifying the problems or
potential opportunities researcher should diagnose situation so as to clarify
the situation. The manager should gain insight about the underlying factors causing the
situations. If there is problems, they need to specify the problems and causes.
v Selecting the course of actions:- after identification of alternative course of
action, research is often conducted to obtain specific information that will
aid in evaluating the alternatives and selecting the best course of actions.
Objective information generated by research to forcast environmental occurrence
may be the foundation for selecting a particular course of actions.
v Implementations of course of actions:- the best plan may also fail if it is not properly implemented. A
manager can undertake the research to find out the tactis to implement the
course of action. Research provides real information regarding the situations
so that the manger can prepare various subsidiary plans to implement course of
action.
v Evaluating the course of actions:- evaluation refers to the formal and objective
measurement and appraisal of the extent to which given activity project or
program has achieved its objectives. After the executions of course of actions
research serve as a tool to inform managers whether planned activities are
properly executed and achieved the result as expected.
Ethics in Business Research
Ethics
in Business Research
What are Ethics?
Ethics are norms or standards of behavior that guide
moral choices about our behavior and our relationship with others. As in other
aspects of business, all parties in research should exhibit ethical behavior.
The goal of ethics in research is to ensure that no one is harmed or suffered
adverse consequences from research activities.
This objective is usually achieved. However,
unethical activities are pervasive and include violating non disclosure
agreement, breaking respondent confidentiality, misrepresenting results,
deceiving people, invoicing irregularities, avoiding legal liability, and more.
As research is designed, several ethical issues must
be balanced.
Ethics are norms or standards of behavior that guide
moral choices about our behavior and our relationships with others. Ethics
differ from legal constraints, in which generally accepted standards have
defined penalties that are universally enforced. The goal of ethics in research
is to ensure that no one is harmed or suffers adverse consequences from
research activities.
As research is designed, several ethical
considerations must be balanced:
• Protect the rights of the participant or subject.
• Ensure the sponsor receives ethically conducted and reported research
• Follow ethical standards when designing research
• Protect the safety of the researcher and team
• Ensure the research team follows the design
In general, research must be designed so a
respondent does not suffer physical harm, discomfort, pain, embarrassment, or
loss of privacy. Begin data collection by explaining to respondent the benefits
expected from the research. Explain that their rights and well being will be adequately
protected and say how that will be done. Be certain that interviewers obtain in
the inform consent of the respondent. The use of deception is questionable;
when it is used, debrief any respondent who has been deceived.
Many sponsor wishes to under take research without
revealing themselves.
Sponsors have the right to demand and receive confidentiality between
themselves and the researchers. Ethical researcher provides sponsors with the
research designed needed to solve the managerial question.
The ethical researcher shows the data objectively, despite the sponsors
preferred outcomes.
The research team’s safety is the responsibility of the researcher. Researcher
should require ethical compliance from team members in following the research
design, just as sponsors expect ethical behavior from the researcher.
Many companies and research firms have adopted a code of ethics. Several
professional associations have detailed research provisions. Of interest are
the American Association for Public Opinion Research, the American Marketing
Association, the American Political Science Association, the American
Psychological Association, and the American Sociological Association. Federal,
state, and local governments have laws, policies, and procedures in place to
regulate research on human beings.
Ethical consideration in business research
The objective of
research in business is to find out exact condition of phenomena. The exact
conditions of phenomena is where researcher flows steps in the scientific research.
If any steps is skipped the research cannot be scientific and becomes
unethical. Ethics are the set of practices that differentiate what should be
done and what should not be done. In the business research are considerations
for making the scientific research are given below:-
v Honesty/politeness
v Participative;
v Avoid the falsifying the data
v Informed consent
v Voluntary participations
v Confidentially and announces
v Obligation to sponsor
Chapter 2:-Literature Review
and Theoretical frameworks
Concept of literature
review:-
Going through previous studies and books with the purpose of knowing
the research issue in detail and find out appropriate methodology is known as
literature review. It is the critical examinations evaluations and scanning of
related literature in order to find out what other have said about the going to
be studied. It is the consultations of literature that said what others have
done. What are their finding what are the methods they used and what is
remaining? It informs the researcher about past research on the topic and
prevent him from selecting the topic which was already taken. A comprehensive
study of document and preparations of summary of such study on a topic is known
as literature review.
According to Walliman:-“a literature review is a
summary and analysis of current knowledge about a particular topic or areas of
enquiry”
Purpose of literatures:
The major purpose of literature review are given below:
v To know the research conducted in the chosen field:- literature review provides
information regarding the issues on which researches were conducted in the
past. It helps to the researcher to find out the issue that remained untouched
and helps to avoid needless duplication in the research work. If you undertake
the research in the issues of that was already studied by others then your work
is unless/worthless.
v To identify the gap:- a researcher find out the untouched area or areas
of contradiction after the literature review which is known as research gap.
Afeter going through the literatures,
researcher can find out areas of contradiction that can be taken as topic for
the further research.
v To develop theoretical framework:- literature review provides the foundation
for developing a comprehensive theoretical framework helps to develop to the
hypothesis. Researcher can undertake an empirical research testing hypothesis
using various statistical and econometric tools.
v To develop research design:- research design refers to the entire plan of the
research. Before designing the research plan researcher should decide about the variable to be
included measuring tools and techniques procedures.
v To update on current issues:- literature review helps to the researcher to know
about the current empirical or theoretical issue or particular area of
research. Issue are changing because of dynamism in environment.
v To know the methods of data analysis:- data should be analyzed to draw the
conclusion. Conclusion drawn by the uses of appropriate tools will be reliable.
Literature review provides ideas regarding the appropriate tools for different
nature of data.
v To know the research design:- different design are used for conducting research
in different subjects. After the literature review, a researcher gets idea that
what short of design is appropriate for his/her study.
v To assess of the success of research design:- different researches sue
different design while conducing research. A researcher can evaluate the result
of various research design that helps to find out success of various research
design.
Kinds of literature review
There are three kind of
literature which are given blows:
1. Primary literature:-
unpublished research , private correspondence and conference proceeding are
considered as primary literature.
2. Secondary literature:-
published books, articles, news, media, and published business government
private and international bodies publications.
3. Tertiary literature;- this
source is getaway to secondary sources. They includes encyclopedias,
dictionaries, citation, indexes, catalogues, and web based. Portal and data
bases.
Relation of literature to
research
Literature and research has
relationship in different domains. Some of the domains of relationship are
given below:
1. Know the concept: Researcher should have concept related to their area of study. Such
concepts and domains of the concepts can be obtained from the study of previous
literatures. It helps to proceed further to the study.
2. Select topic:- Generally, academic research topics are selected from the gap of the
previous studies. Researcher can find out the gap from the previous studies and
finalize the topic of his/ her study.
3. Identify variables:- After deciding the topic, a researcher should find out the major
domains which can measure the concept of the study. Researcher can find out
such prominent domains going through previous literatures.
4. Frame conceptual framework:- Researcher should establish the relationship
between the dependent and independent variables before conducting research.
Such relationship is assessed only through the relationships established by the
previous studies.
5. Decide research design:- Literature provides ideas to the researchers about
research designs that are used in the study of different issues. Researcher can
decide the research design for their studies based on the study of previous
literatures.
6. Select the instruments for data collection:- A researcher can collect
data using various techniques and tools like questionnaire, interview,
observation, etc. A researcher can decide the appropriate instrument for data
collection going through previous literature.
7. Select tool for data analysis:- Various analysis tools can be used to analyze data.
But appropriate of tool depends on nature and types of data. So, a researcher
can decide the analysis tool with the help f literature review.
Theoretical framework and its format
A theoretical framework is a
conceptual model that shows the relationships among the several factors that
have been identified as important to the problems. It is the prepaid after the
literature review and interview with the concerned party and defining and
problem. It present logically to the previous research result and develops
scientific bases relating to the assumptions with theories. It presents the
relationship between dependent and independent variables that helps to develop
hypothesis. A networks that shows the relationship between dependent and
independent of moderating variables is known as theoretical framework. It deals
with variable of our study and tends to show the relationship between them. The
frameworks that show the kind of relationship among the variables of purposed
study. It gives the pathway for completing research in allocated time and
resources.
Needs of Theoretical Frameworks for Research
Theoretical framework identifies the variable, states the relationship
of two or more variable and reasons of expecting such relationship. Thus,
theoretical frameworks is essential while undertaking research du to the
following reasons.
v It helps the researcher to
see clearly the variable of the study.
v It provides a general
frameworks for data collections.
v It provides a general
framework for data analysis.
v It is essential in preparing
a research proposal using descriptive
and experimental methods.
v It helps to connect theories
with studies.
v It shows the relationship
between variables based on the previous studies.
Research
and theory
Every research is based on theory. Research and theory are mutually
relate. Theory has different component like; proposition, concept, construct,
operational, definition, variable, hypothesis and model. Every research is
based all above components. Most of the basic research contributes to improvement
in the theory. When theories are tested in different situations and the results
are similar then it contributes to the development of model. Thus, theory helps
to undertake research in the systematic way and research helps to improve in
the existing theory or develop new theory. Therefore, they are reciprocally
related to each other. It is important for researcher to recognize the
pervasiveness and value theory. Theory serves us in many useful ways it.
v Narrows down the facts we
needs to study
v Suggest which research
approaches are likely to yield the greatest meaning.
v Suggest a system for a
researcher to impose on data in order to classify them in the most meaningful
way.
Research approach
A. Deductions reasoning approaches:- under this approaches, research works moves from the
general information to the specific information. It is the top down approaches,
so researcher start at the top with very broad spectrum of information and they
work their way down to a specific conclusion. It can be summarized as follows: begin
with theory-narrow down to specific hypothesis-observations for collecting data
and test the hypothesis-ultimately leads to confirmation of the original theory
refusing some dimensions of it and arriving at a conclusions.
B. Inductions reasoning approach:- it works the the opposite way of
deductive reasoning. It moves from specific observations to broaders
generalizations and theories. It is a bottom-up approach. The researcher begins
with specific observations and measures, detects patterns, formulate some
tentative hypothesis to explore and finally ends up developing some general conclusions
or theories.
Steps/guidelines f or
conducting literature review
There are various way
of literature review. Various researcher
uses different ways of review. But all the researcher should consider to
the following points while reviewing literature.
v Easy issue is to be
comprehensively raised and specialized
concentrating on research problems.
v Researcher should discard
the unnecessary materials.
v Original source is to be
used if it is possible.
v Researcher should
incorporate objective, methodology and major finding in the literature review.
v Researcher should consider
that how we can use the avaible materials and how to remove weakness of such
materials.
v Researcher should arrange
the materials on the basis of rationality and they should be organized
logically
v Researcher should analyze
the related materials only.
v Explanations and definitions
of the subject must b made on the basis of review result.
Searching, obtaining and evaluating the literature
While researching literature
a researcher should consider to the card and catalogue maintained and in the
libraries of the universities or other independent groups, clubs and committee
computerized catalogue subject literature guides CD-ROM technologies and online
database. A researcher can take the help
of computer and locate the required material. If they are not able to find out
the required materials they can take help of library staff. CD-ROM provides
technology provides the bibiographics details article graphics book and
abstract of research work and full text of the research works. Now days the
researcher use internet for locating the essential literature they may not
be relevant. Thus researcher should
precisely identify the literature that is useful for their study.
Reading and review of the literature
After getting the literature
reviewer should go through all materials or abstract so as to identify the
relevant and non-relevant literatures. While reviewing the material researcher
should locate the relevant sections of the books articles and other materials
and note of them. If you find the useful materials while reading you should
note down of them. You can note the direct quotation in hanging from or keeping
within inverted comma. You should down the following things while reviewing the
empirical evidence.
·
Title of the study
·
Authors,
·
Year of publications
·
Objective of the study
·
Problems and statement /hypothesis
·
Research methodology used
·
Research finding
·
Conclusion
Evaluating the literatures:-
All the materials collect may not be equally important and useful to
the present research works. Some literature that are collected may not be
accurate and reliable. Thus researcher should evaluate the materials based on
the following criteria.
·
Accuracy
·
Authors
·
Publisher
·
Scope
·
Style
·
Use of methodology
·
Illustrations tables and diagrams
·
Update information
Researcher should first evaluate the introductions part. While
evaluating it, researcher should see the clarity of purpose, follow of research
problems and theoretical frameworks followed by hypothesis and testability of
hypothesis.
phases/steps in the literatures
reviews
the major steps/phases in the literature review are given belows:
v Listing source
v Obtaining
v Critical examinations of literature review
v Note taking
v APA style:
Sources of
literature review
Review of previous works related to research topic is known as
literature review. To review the concept of
research various source document are needed. Those important document or
source of literature are given below:
v Books:- a researcher needs to know the concept of related topics and variable
used in research. To know the theories which are related to the research to[ic
a researcher should review the various books. Books are fund in libraries.
v Research articles:- research article provides the most up-to-date information in the
topic under study and often cover subject not readily found in the books.
Review of articles provides overview of a subject with extensive reference
lists and makes excellent starting places for research.
v Abstracts:- it provides summary of the articles. The information can be crucial
in deciding whether the articles is valuable to read entirely. Abstract
incorporate the summary of the research works source of information and data
research methodology and major facts found during the course of research.
v Reports:- reports are published by the government and non-government and national and international
organization are also the source of literature review. They prepare such
reports after the completions of research works. As well the reports and
document presented in the workshop seminar and meeting are also the important
source of literature.
v Dissertations;- dissertations prepared by the Ph.D and master level scholar are also
major sources of literature for academic research. Researcher should review the
dissertations related to the topics.
v Directories:- directories provides the useful information about organization or
individual and are useful guides to other source of information. There are a
numbers of directories that list ongoing. Research and it is wise to check out
that your research is not going to duplicate an existing research.
v The internet:- the worldwide web provides a multimedia interface to the internet and
webpages provides links to information and document. The internet provides
access to library catalogues, online data base and electronic journals.
Chapter 3:-Problem Definition and Hypothesis
Formulations
Concept:-
Research problem is a gap between actual and desired outcomes. A
problem could simply indicate an interest in an issue where finding the right
answer might hekp to improve an existing situations. Problem definition is
clear and precise statement of question or issue that is to be investigate for
finding an answer. Problem definition refers to the existing business problems
where a manager is looking for situations, situation that is not put any
problems at present but managers thing should be improved. Generally research
problems is an interrogative sentence and they present the relationship of
variables which are unclear.
Steps in problem formulations:
There are some steps that
are to be followed while formulating problems. They are given below:
v Identifications of broad problems areas:- first of all researcher should develop research idea from
the observation theory and need to be solve the problems that are encountering
by the organizations. Researcher may observed events incidentally or systematically
and make the planned observations go through the published report research
develop idea about the area of research where he/she undertake the research.
v Divide the subject areas in the sub-areas: the subject areas of your interest may
be broad and you need to divide it into small areas. For example if your areas
is children nutrition then you can dissect it into malnutrition in children
diseases childhood morality.
v Decide about areas:- select an areas among all the sub-areas one that interest you most.
This will help inn creating a research problems among which you have to choose
one.
v Defining problem:- after identifying the broad problem area researcher should get
insight into the problems. A researcher can define problem analyzing the
situation. A researcher can take information through interview or personal
conversation to define the problems.
v Deciding about the objectives:- objectives are the possible answer to the research
problems that you have formulated. The objective need to be specific in nature
but you can also generate general objectives. Objective must be attainable in
time and with the available technical financial and human resources.
Research Questions
Research questions is a statement designed/developed in the research
that identifies the factors to be studied. Basically research questions are
clearly tells about the factors you attempt to learn. The objective of research
must match to each other. Research question help to you to do work in the trend
as you intended. A research try to find out the answer off all those questions
while undertaking the research works. While developing the research question a
researcher should identify area of interest and have preliminary survey or
literature overview and find out the variables.
Types of research questions:
Mainly research questions are classified into three groups which are
given below:
1.
Descriptive questions:- the questions that are designed to describe
what is going on or existing position of events objects or issue then such
questions are known as descriptive questions.
2.
Observational/ relational
questions:-
the questions that are designed to know the relation between two or more
variables under study are known as observational or relational questions.
3.
Causal or cause and effect
questions:-
the questions that are designed to determine the effect of one or more causes
to one or more outcomes variables. It tries to find out the effect and after
and before occurring any events in the organizations.
Hypothesis
Hypothesis is the statement
that shows the guess relationship between independent and dependent variables.
Hypothesis formulations of require base. Hypothesis is generate through a
number of ways but usually the result of process of inductive reasoning where observation
leads to formations of theory. The relationship is estimated on the basis of
the network of association established in the theoretical frameworks formulate
for the research works. A good hypothesis shows the directions of research and relationship
between the variables and helps to find out the solutions of the problems.
FUNCTIONS OF HYPOTHESIS:
Major functions of hypothesis are given belows:-
v Shows the areas of emphasis:- it shows where the emphasis is to be given in
research. It clearly identifies the variables to be studied so that researcher
can get the idea about the area where emphasis to be given.
v Provides the guideline for collecting data:- it direct the researcher
regarding collection of information and data and provides guidelines for
prioritizing the nature of data.
v Inform about areas of subjectivity priority:- it helps to give a subjective
priority on the certain elements. It clearly identifies the issues and events
on which subjective analysis is essential for conducting research.
v Basis of research:- it is a
major basis of research hypothesis is tested using various statistical tools.
If hypothesis is proved by the various statistical tests then such hypothesis
becomes theory. Developments theory is the major outcome of the research.
v Help to test empirically:- hypothesis are the testable statement. They can be
tested using mathematical tools. Such tested results are considered as valid
one.
Features or
criteria of a good hypothesis:
Hypothesis is a declarative statement that helps to draw conclusions.
Thus, it should have some qualities which are given below:
v Power of prediction:-one of the valuable attribute of good hypothesis is
to predict for future. It not only clears the present problematic situation but
also predects or the future that what would be happened in the coming time. So
hypothesis is best guide of research activity due to power of predictor.
v Simplicity:- a hypothesis should be understandable to every layman. A
hypothesis would be simple if a researcher has more insight toward the
problems. Researcher should use simples words and sentences while developing
hypothesis.
v Clarity:- a hypothesis must be conceptually clear. It should be clear and
should not contain ambiguous information. The terminology used in it must be
clear and acceptable to every one.
v Testability:- a good hypothesis should be empirically. It should be formulated
after the verifications and deep
observation. Thus, testability is the prime features of a good hypothesis.
v Relevant to problems:- a hypothesis is guideline for identification and
solutions of the problems, thus, it should be relevant and accordance to the
problems.
v Specifics:- it should be formulated for a specific and particular problems. It
should not be include generalization. If generalization exists, then hypothesis
cannot research to the correct conclusion.
v Relevant to the available technology:- hypothesis must be relevant
to the techniques which is available for testing. A researcher must know about
the workable techniques before formulating hypothesis.
v Consistency and harmony:- internal consistency and harmony and is major
characteristics of good hypothesis. It should
out of of contradiction and conflicts. There must be a close
relationship between variables which one is depend on others.
Types and formats of
Hypothesis
Hypothesis is formulated based on the estimated relationship between
two or more variables. Formats of hypothesis differ as per the nature of
relationship of variables. On the basis
of formats used in research, hypothesis can be classified into different groups.
They are given below:
v Descriptive hypothesis:- descriptive hypothesis present the existences size, types
and distribution of variables. Descriptive
hypothesis contains the only one variables. So , it does not present the
relationship between or among the variables. Thus, researchers often use a
research questions rather then descriptive hypothesis. Generally this
hypothesis describe the situation and
helps to clear their thinking about the likely relationship to be found.
v Relational hypothesis:- hypothesis that
explains the relationship between two or more then variables is known as
relational hypothesis. Relational hypothesis is divided into two groups i.e
correlation hypothesis and explanatory or causal hypothesis. Co relational
hypothesis states that the variables occur together in some specified manner
without implying that one cause of the other. such weeks are claims are made
when some causal force that affect both varrible and when we have not developed
enough evidence to claims strong linkage.
A hypothesis which formulate based on the assumptions that change in one
variable (independent variables) change in a nothe variable (dependent
variables) is known as exploratory or causal hypothesis.
v Directional and non-directional
hypothesis:- a hypothesis that is formulated using the words more and less
likes, and dislikes or comparing two variables is known as directional
hypothesis. It is also known as directional because it gives directions to the
relationship of the two variables. For examples women employees are more loyal
towards organization then male employees. If
b any hypothesis shows the relationship or difference between variable but
does not direct the relationship such hypothesis is known as non-directional
hypothesis. In other words even though the relationship between the various
variable can be estimated but their relations remains positive or negative that
can not be declared such hypothesis is non-directional hypothesis. For examples
there is relationship between age and job satisfactions
v Null and alternative hypothesis:- the null hypothesis is a proposition that a
definite or exact relationship between two variables. It states that the
population correlation between two variables is equal to zero or that the
difference inn the means two groups inn the population between two variable or
no difference between two groups in the population is equal to zero. In general
null statement is expressed as no relationship[p between two variables or
indicating difference between two groups. The alternative hypothesis is
statement is expressing a relationship between two variables or indicating
difference between groups. It is exactly opposite of null hypothesis. Null
hypothesis is donated by H0 and alternative hypothesis is donated by H1. Formulating
the hypothesis are as follows:-
v H0:- effective training does
not increase the productivity of employees.
v H1:-effective training
increase the productivity of employees.
There are many types of error in the sue of hypothesis research. They
are given below:-
1. Type-I error: such error
takes place when researcher rejects
hypothesis because statistical tools reject it even through it is correct.
2. Type-II error:- such error
takes places when researcher accepts hypothesis even though it is wrong because
statistical tools to accept it. Such error is more harmful then previous error.
Chapter4:-Research Design
Concept of research design
The design of a study defines the study type (descriptive, correlation,
semi-experimental, experimental, review, meta-analytic) and sub-type (e.g., descriptive-longitudinal case
study), research problem, hypotheses, independent and
dependent variables, experimental design,
and, if applicable, data collection methods ... The research design refers to the overall strategy that
you choose to integrate the different components of the study in a coherent and
logical way, thereby, ensuring you will effectively address the research problem; it constitutes the blueprint
for the collection, measurement, and analysis of data. It cycles from the
problems selecting data collections measurement and analysis and selection of
methods of analysis of data draw conclusion and generalization of finding based
on the availability of resource tools. It is an overall plan of completing the
research works. It present works of research serially from the beginning to the
ends logical way. After selecting the issue of research a researcher formulates plan and framework for
completing his/her research work since beginning till the end is known as
research design.
Features of Research design
It is
prepaid on the basis on the basis of certain procedures. Thus, it requires some
qualities that are given below.
v Reliability
v Objectivity
v Validity
v Replicabilty
v Generalizability
Elements
of Research Design
Research design is overall plan of undertaking
the research. Thus, it must cover the whole dimension of the research so, a
good research design must have following elements.
v The problems:- first of all research design should clearly identify and define the
research issues. Until and unless the
nature of the research issues is not
clear we can not decide about the data collection and analysis methods and
procedures.
v Methods and techniques of data collections:- a researcher should collect data based
on the nature of the research problems. Some researcher requires primary data
and others. The secondary data. As well as there are number of techniques for
collecting the primary data.
v Methods and techniques of data analysis:- various tools are developed by
statistician and econometrician for analyzing data. But all the tools will not
be appropriate in the entire situation. Thus, research design should indicate
the analytical tools that are used while undertaking research works.
v Population and sample:- research design should clearly indicate the
populations sample, sampling procedures,
procedures and sample size. As well it should explain the techniques of data
collections and analysis.
v Objective of the study:- research design should clearly spell the
general and specific objective of undertaking the research works.
v Report writing: research design
clearly defines the types of report and procedures of writing reports. It shows
the chapter outlines of the research reports. It provides guidelines to make cohesive to the research
reports.
v Time periods:- a time frameworks for every resources works should be
given so that the every dimensions of research work can be completed with in
the given time periods.
v Dimensions and sociological context of the study:- research design should be identify the dimension that
will be considered while conducting the research and social environmental
forces where the finding of the study will be implemented.
Types
of research
A details plan that is prepared
to search the answer of the research problems is known as research problems. Research
design should be selected based on research objectives, nature of research and
availability of resources. Different research design are used to search the
answer of the different research questions. Thus, entire research designs are
classified in the following categories.
What are the Different Types of Research Designs Methods ?
It
is crucial that you select a suitable research design before any research is
started. Various types can be classified as:
1.
Historical Research Design – The idea is to gather, validate, synthesize
evidence to establish facts which defend or oppose your hypothesis. It makes
use of primary sources, secondary sources, and a lot of qualitative data
sources for example logs, diaries, official data, reports, and so on. The issue
is that the sources need to be both authentic and valid.
2.
Case Study: It is an in-depth investigation of a specific research problem
as opposed to a sweeping statistical survey. It is usually employed to limit a
very wide area of research into one or a few easily research-able examples. The
case study research design can also be helpful for testing whether a particular
theory and model actually pertains to phenomena in real life. It is a useful
design if not much is known about a phenomenon.
3.
Descriptive research: Descriptive research includes much government
backed research such as the population census, the gathering of a broad range
of social indicators and economic information for example household expenditure
patterns, time use studies, employment and crime statistics.
4.
Causal Design: Causality research could be regarded as understanding a
phenomenon with regards to conditional statements in the form, “If A, then B.”
This kind of research is utilized to determine what affect a certain change may
have on present norms and assumptions. The majority of social scientists seek
causal explanations which reflect tests of hypotheses. Causal effect takes
place when variation in one phenomenon, an independent variable, results in, on
average, in variation in another phenomenon, the dependent variable.
5.
Longitudinal Research Design: A longitudinal study consists of a
panel, which is a fixed sample of elements. The elements could be shops,
retailers, individuals, or other entities. The panel, or sample, stays
relatively constant over time, despite the fact that members may be added to
replace dropouts or to keep it representative. The sample members in a panel
are calculated regularly over time, in contrast with the one-time measurement
in a cross-sectional study.
6.
Cross-Sectional Design: Cross-sectional research designs have 3 exclusive
features: no time dimension, a reliance upon present differences rather than
change following intervention; and, groups are chosen according to existing
differences as opposed to random allocation. The cross-sectional design can
only measure differences between or from among a number of people, subjects, or
phenomena instead of change. As a result, researchers employing this design can
only use a relative passive approach to making causal inferences based on findings.
7.
Correlation or Prospective Research Design: It tries to discover
relationships to make predictions. It uses one set of subjects with a couple of
variables for each.
8.
Cohort Design: A cohort study is a research program looking into a specific
group with a certain trait, and observes over a period of time. A few examples
of cohorts may be those who have taken a certain medicine, or have a medical
problem.
9.
Observational Design: This kind of research design draws a conclusion by
evaluating subjects against a control group, in situations where the researcher
doesn’t have control over the experiment. There are a couple of general types
of observational designs. In direct observations, people realize that you are
watching them. Unobtrusive measures include any way of studying behavior where
individuals have no idea they are being observed. An observational study allows
a good insight into a phenomenon and eliminates the ethical and practical
complications of establishing a large and cumbersome research project.
10.
Experimental Research Design: This design is best suited in controlled
settings for example labs. The design assumes random assignment of subjects and
random assignment to groups (A and C). It tries to investigate cause and affect
associations where causes could be manipulated to generate different types of
effects. Due to the requirement of random assignment, this design can be
challenging to carry out in the real world (non laboratory) setting.
11.
Philosophical Design: This method makes use of the tools of argumentation
based on philosophical traditions, concepts, models, and theories to critically
explore and challenge, for instance, the relevance of logic and evidence in
academic debates, to evaluate arguments about fundamental problems, or to
discuss the cause of existing discourse about a research problem.
Types of research Design
research design should be
selected based on the research objectives nature of research and availability
of resource. Different research designs are used to search the answer of the
different research questions. Thus, entire research design are the classified
in the following categories.
v Exploratory research design:- a research design that is
used to identify the problems and analysis of problems selections of alternatives
and find new idea in the area where is less knowledge is known as exploratory
research design. Exploration is useful when researcher lack of clear idea of
the problems. Exploratory research develops concept more clearly establishes to
priorities develop operational definitions and improve the final research
design. This design is less structured and more flexible. This design uses
informal approach and explains the problems and collect the data. Exploratory
research design formulates hypothesis and present the clear situation and
provides directions for formal situations. Following methods are used while
using this research design.
o Gaining the knowledge on
concerned subject reviewing available literature.
o Enquiring and interviewing
about the matters with concerned people so that more knowledge about the
research problems can be obtained.
o Analyzing the qualitative data
and information collected from various sources.
o Preparing the research
reports after the completion of all above works.
v Descriptive research design:- a research design that is developed with the
aim of the studying the subject or research details and explains the facts and
characteristics related to research problems is known as descriptive research
design. It collect and present the facts and figures in certain situations. The
goal of the descriptive study is to describe relevant aspect of the factors of
interest to the researcher from an individual organization or other
perspective. It uses the scientific methods for collecting classifying and
analysis related data facts and figures. Research related to prediction
explanations of facts and individual group or situation is descriptive
research. Following works are to be performed while using this types of research design.
o Determinations of study
objective
o Collections of sample
o Preparing procedures for
collecting data.
o Collections of data
o Processing and analyzing
data.
o Preparing reports
incorporating facts.
Descriptive study can be
undertaken using following methods.
Case study:- case study is involves a details and intensive analysis of any
single event or case. Case study methods entails the detail and intensive
analysis of event or social issue. It analysis the events through the
observations and comes to know to the positions of the total units. Qualitative
method is used to collect information
and data. Following steps should be step be followed by while implementing case
study.
o Determine
the objectives
o Preparing
and improving questions and concentrating few event.
o Collections
of data from various sources.
o Arranging
evidence and analysis of event of explaining in details.
o Preparing
reports summarizing the facts and providing suggestions.
Development research design:-a research design used to
predict the future trends considering to
the changes in events in the human social and cultural activities is known as
developmental research design. This research design is used to study the
variable of specified time correlations between variable rate of change directions
and other inter-related subjects. Developmental research is classified into
various groups which are given below:
o Longitudinal
growth study
o Cross
sectional growth study
o Trend study
o Cohort
study
v Co relational study: a study that is used to study the relationship
between two or more variables is known as correlational study. In correlational
study it is assumed that if there is changes in one variable then there will be
the change in other variable. The main aim of this research design is to see
the relationship and the degree of relationship between variables. Correlations
may be positive or negative. Increases in one vrriable leads to increase to
other variables is known as positive correlation. For examples increase in
advertisement increase in sales is positive correlation. While increasing one variables
leads to decrease to the other variable is known as negative correlation. For
example, increase in the salary of employees decrease profit of an organizations. Following steps should be followed while using
correlational research design.
o Defining
problems reviewing literature
o Developing
conceptual design
o Collections
of data.
o Analysis
and interpretation of result.
v Causal comparative research design:- a research design that is used to show the
causes of the problems is known as causal comparative research design. It
observe the position of causes that impact on certain works. It explain the
relationship of two variables after the study of the problems. It is also known
as Ex-post facto research design. This study analysis the performance of
organization after and before any events. Researcher consider to one or more
variable and analysis the related data to find cause of their relationship.
Such research requires to two groups for selected for compression. The main
aims of this research is to assess the of difference in two groups. Following
steps should be followed while using this research design.
o Defining
research problems
o Reviewing
concerned literatures
o Formulating
hypothesis preparations list of assumptions of hypothesis and research process.
o Preparing
the conceptual design.
o Providing
the authenticity and reliability of data collection method
o Analyzing
and interpreting the result concisely and precisely.
v Experimental research:- the research controls all other variables and
conduct research considering two few variables through observation or
experiment is known as experimental research design. In this research variables
under study are free and all other variables and controlled. It is used to
provides a stronger basis for existence of causal relationship between
dependent and independent variable. The main of this research is to see the
relationship formulating and hypothesis. It can be used in laboratory and work
field. Work field has real life situation. The researcher need to be able
control the influence of one or more variables on the dependent variable for
the use of this research design.
v Quasi-experimental research:- - This research design approximates
the experimental design but does not have a control group. There is more error
possible in the results. When design not meet randomization and control
requirement necessary for controlling the influence of unnecessary variables
a Quasi-experimental research is the
second best choice.
v Basic principles of research design
Principles are the fundamental assumptions. There are some
fundamental assumptions in the selections of research design which are given
below:-
v principles of flexibility
v principle of timeliness
v principles of replications
v principles of objective
v principles of generalizability
v principles of reliability
v validity
qualitative research
all the
issue of research are not measurable and cannot be converted into number of can
not be quantified. Especially the issues/subject of social science research are
related to human behavior culture, trends, relationship and human values and
norms. So, it is very difficult to quantify such subject. Such subject need to
be interpreted in depth. Thus, research which is conducted to interpret
analysis and obtain in-depth knowledge of an issue/subject is known as
qualitative research. It provides
details of the events or incident which were not expected. Qualitative
techniques are based at the both data collection and analysis stage of the
research works. At the stage of data collections the list of techniques like
focus groups discussion individual depth interview, case studies grounded
theory action research and observations re used. Qualitative research draws
data from a variety of sources. Qualitative research is carried out on small samples of the
population. For example, you may be interested in researching a segmented group
of your target audience such as a particular buyer persona or age group (e.g.
Travel enthuastists, females in the 20-25 age bracket.) Qualitative research.
Those sources are:-
·
individual or group
·
organizations intuition
·
texts i.e published un[ublished including virtual ones.
·
Environment i.e visual/ sensory and virtual materials.
·
Objectives and media products i.e textual/visual/sensory and
virtual materials.
·
Elements and happening i.e textual/visual/sensory and virtual materials.
Features
of qualitative research:-
Qualitative research is
based on the subjective information. Such qualitative are considered as the
features of qualitative research. Some of the major features of qualitative
research are given belows.
·
Interpretive:- qualitative research are human behavior
understanding motivations and similar types of hidden qualities of people. It
analysis and interpret the events and functions or problems tries t find out
the reason for occurring events or problems. s
·
Based on qualitative facts:-
qualitative
research uses subjective information rather then quantitative information. It
analysis the subjective information and explain the situation to explore the
real casues and procedures of occurring the events.
·
Purposive sampling :- purposive sampling is used
in qualitative research. Researcher does not consider to the representation of
populations. He/she only select as sample to those units which can give
meaningful response/o the the researcher regarding nay events or issue.
·
Change in research design:-Research design
can be changed when & where
essential . If researcher thinks that
the research design i.e. sample
size, data collection & tools for
analysis, creates hindrances then he/she can change any or whole parts of the
research design.
·
Self collections of data :- It is better to collect the data by
the researcher himself because he/she gets the opportunity to get information
from the gesture of respondents. Sometimes, symbols speak louder than words.
When researcher collects the data, he/she can get in-depth knowledge putting
more questions.
·
Holistic assumptions. Qualitative research assumes that there are
no single facts for the occurrence of events/issues. There will be the multiple
facts/reasons for the occurrence of events/issues. Perception of people over such facts/issues changes with
the pace of time & change in other factors like age, experience etc.
Assumptions
of qualitative research
Assumptions are the
fundamental facts. It helps to carry out the activities. Qualitative research
has some fundamental assumptions which are given below.
·
Research keep the holistic approach:-Qualitative research explains
to any events or issues or issues considering to all the causes of occurrence,
process & other activities & relationship between or among the
variables. Thus, it does not explain the events based on the single facts It
considers to every related facts while explaining the events/issues. Thus
it keeps holistic approach.
·
Research is incorporates emergent design:- Quantitative research
uses only predetermined research design & design can’t be changed during
the course of conducting research. But qualitative research can apply research design while collecting data, if it
is essential. Researcher requires changing design due to change in context.
Researcher can change design where necessary.
·
Research is descriptive:- The main aim of qualitative research is
to achieve in-depth information regarding event & problems. Qualitative
research explains the subjects matter & process of participation. Thus, it
is subjective in nature &explains the events in macro level. So qualitative
research is descriptive in nature.
·
Primary concerned with process rather than outcomes:- Qualitative
research emphasizes more to the methods that are used in the research. It explains
the complex procedures. Thus, it considers more method then the results of the
research.
·
Research involves fields of works:-Qualitative research assumes
that the researcher collect data & information himself contacting to the
respondents personally so that researcher can get in-depth knowledge about the
event putting further questions as well can understand the symbolic language
& materializes to those information in research.
·
The process of research is inductive:- Qualitative research
doesn’t formulate & test any hypothesis. It find out the features of events
and causes of occurrence of such events. This work based on the estimation
& experience of the researcher. Qualitative research explains to the events
so as to make them understandable.
·
Research is subjective:- Qualitative researcher measures any event
on the basis of researcher’s intuition. Mathematical & statistical tools
are not widely used in the qualitative research. Researcher explains &
predicts the event & issues using his/her intuition. So it is more
subjective in nature.
Types of qualitative research design
Qualitative research is a
descriptive research conducted to achieve in depth information about any events
or problems. Some major qualitative research
design are given below:
·
Historical study:- Research collects the past
data systematically &makes objective evaluation of the past event or
problem so as to understands causes, effect & trends of the events or
problems is historical study. It helps to explain present events &
anticipate future events.
·
Case study methods:- It is study that considers
single unit or case so as know the multiple facet of the problem occurred. It
lights on factors with the study of a single case in detail. The case may be an
individual, a group, an institution or an event.
·
Grounded theory:- grounded theory is a
systematic methodology in the social sciences involving the constructions of
theory through the analysis of data. Fashion from social science research is
the positivist tradition. Unlike positivist research, is study using grounded
theory is likely to begin with question or even just with the qualitative data.
·
Ethnography:- a social science research focuses on a
community to explain about the events or problems through close observations of
socio-cultural factors is known as ethnography.
·
Participative research:- a researcher conducted to develop reality
based local theory that is understandable and actionable is known as
participative research. In this research, researcher jointly diagnoses the
problem, combines design of the project formulate plan participation build
triangular team and makes joint assessment and implements the finding.
Quantitative research is:
- a formal, objective,
systematic process for obtaining quantifiable information about the world;
- presented in numerical form,
and analysed through the use of statistics;
- used to describe and to test
relationships;
- used to examine the
cause-and-effect of relationships.
In
effect, to put it simply, quantitative research is concerned with numbers,
statistics, and the relationships between events/numbers.
Quantitative
researchers attempt to remain detached from the study, and from the sample (in
studies where the sample is made up of human beings). They strive to maintain
objectivity - in other words they try to not influence it with their own
personal values, feelings, and experiences.
This
is because quantitative researchers believe that researcher involvement in the
study could bias it. By 'bias it', they mean that they do not want to sway the
study towards the perceptions and values of the researcher, rather than
allowing the hard scientific facts to hold sway. Biasing a research study is
considered by scientists as being poor scientific technique - and is
definitely a no-no in quantitative research.
Difference between qualitative research and
quantitative research
|
Bases
of difference |
Qualitative research |
Quantitative research |
|
Focus of research |
It is used to understand
and interpret events or problems |
It is used to explain and
predict the events/situations |
|
Purpose of research |
The
main aim is to achieve an in-depth understanding of situations and develops
of theory |
The main of the
quantitative research is to explain predict and test and retest the theories.
|
|
Preparations of participations
|
To eliminates the biasness of participants preliminary
preparations of participants is desirables.
|
Preliminary preparations
is not essential to reduce or eliminate or biasness. |
|
Approach |
It emphasis on inductive approach to see the relationship
between theory and research |
It emphasis on deductive
approach which shows the relationship between
theory and research in which the accent placed the placed on the testing of
theories. |
|
Usefulness |
This research useful for innovations and study of events. |
This research is useful
fo survey and experimental research works.
|
|
Sample size |
This research uses fewer samples while conducting research |
This research uses wide
range and large sample while conducting research. |
Unit:-5 measurement, scaling and sampling
Variables:-
A variable is symbol of an
event, act characteristics traits or attributes that can be measured and
assigned categorical values. In other words any signal or figure or symbol
which represents the quality characters and facts is known as variables. Value of variable is differ from one activity
to next activity. Value of variable differ to some satisfactions are the same
examples of variables. Motivation, government policy the member of the
organization. It may very simple and
low level in different people thus motivations differ as per person so it is
variables. Generally numerical variables are allotted to the variables on the
basis of their features that help to keep record and analysis of them. Some
variable can be classified only two groups and women employees and unemployed.
Such variable are provides 0 and 1 symbols some variables of may classified in
groups. For example, employees are highly absent, normally absent and less
absent in the organization. According to
F.N Kerlinger:-“ a variables is
symbol to which numeral or values are assigned.”
Types of variables
Variable can be classified in the following groups on the basis of
their use in research.
v Independent variable:- a variable
which influences dependent variable in positive or negative is known as
independent variables. Such variable do not change due to change other
variable. But change in independent variables change in other variables. If independent variable is changed
by one unit then dependent variable
will be changed in some degree. For example there is a theory that employee
satisfaction increases ,performance of employees. It means if employee satisfaction
decrease performance also increases .in this example, performance also decreases and if employee satisfaction
but change in performance dose not change in
satisfaction is independent variable.
v Dependent variables:- variables, that are affected by the change in
independent variables, known as dependent variables. The dependent variable is
the variable of primary interest to the researchers. The researcher goals is to
explain or predict the variability in the dependent variables. By the analysis
of the new product development increase in sale. Here sale is dependent
variable because sales is influenced by the new product development.
v Moderating variables:- a variable that affect the nature of the
relationship between the dependent and independent variables is known as
moderating variables. Presence of the modifies the originally expected
relationship between the dependent and independent variables. For example the
effect of varying level of stress in different employees influence the
relationship between the management style and retention. If there is more stress, employee may leave
the job quickly. Gender and age are often moderating variables because stress
absorbing capacity depend on the age and gender of the people.
v intervening variables:- an intervening is one that surface between the
time the independent variables operate the influence the dependent variable and
their impact on the dependent variable. The intervening variable surface as
function of the independent variable/variables and operating in any station and
help to conceptualize and explain of the influence of the independent variable
on dependent variable for example, generally it is assumed that effective
training increase in employees’ commitment but the impact is not similar in all
employees studies showed that employees with more job tenure have more
commitment. Thus, tenure of the job intervening variable.
Concept of
Measurement
Assigning n umbers of other symbols to any products
or event issue or characteristics as per the certain pre-specified rules is
known as measurement. Symbols are the means of finding out the characters of any event.
Comments
Post a Comment